John Stuart Mill offered a short discourse on the nature of the utilitarianism theory. The theory will demonstrate the immorality of drone strikes in the fight against terror, as well as demonstrate that the use of drones can equate to a form of terrorism. The ethical considerations noted above will be investigated in this paper from a utilitarian theory of ethics which aptly helps the investigation of ethics from the perspective of the consequences of the actions – in this case, the deployment of drones in the fight against terrorism. Civilian deaths caused by drone strikes in Pakistan for instance, far outnumber the terrorists killed through the tactic (Woods & Lambs, 2012). The second attack targeted individuals trying to rescue the casualties of the previous drone strikes or those in attendance of funerals resultant of the previous drone strike (Woods & Lambs, 2012). The pattern, designated as a double tap, had CIA drone operators rapidly persecute a second strike on a previous target. The Stanford and York Universities published a study titled “Living under Drones” by Cavallaro, Sonnenberg, and Knuckey (2012) which showed immoral deployment of these weapons by the Central Intelligence Agency. Apart from the foregoing moral argument against the use of drones, recent research have found a troubling tendency in drone deployment. Several opponents of the method argue that using a drone to eliminate an enemy is equivalent to killing through remote control. Drone warfare removes soldiers from the battlefield and its repercussions. Unlike previous military weapons that generated ethical quandaries due to their destructive nature, the deployment of drone attacks poses a distinct set of ethical quandaries. Current arguments on the morality of drone strikes follow the extensive military deployment of drones in the battle against terrorism by both the US and British governments.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |